Investigating Mechanisms of Relevance for Explainable Information Retrieval Systems
As information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines and conversational agents, become integral to various domains, ensuring their transparency and explainability is crucial for accountability, fairness, and unbiased results. However, we still lack a clear understanding of what concepts are used to determine relevance and how those concepts are combined inside these models. This thesis argues that analyzing the underlying mechanisms of Transformer-based IR models reveals how they extract and compose relevance signals, providing the foundation for building explainable, more trustworthy, and controllable systems. First, I introduce a hypothesis-testing framework that assesses the presence and location of classical relevance notions within models, demonstrating that attention heads implementing exact-match behavior can be isolated. Second, I analyze how models extract and combine multiple relevance signals and show that they implement BM25-like behavior, identifying where relevance information is stored and pointing to opportunities for targeted controllability. Third, I apply this mechanistic approach to gender bias in retrieval, finding that gender signals overlap with term-matching signals in the model’s relevance computation, and test the potential for targeted interventions. Overall, this thesis provides a more nuanced understanding of the relevance mechanisms underlying Transformer-based IR models, enhancing explainability and creating a foundation for targeted control toward safer and more trustworthy retrieval.
Host: Professor Carsten Eickhoff
Title: Shaping Dementia Research Together: Engaging People Living With Dementia and Care Partners
Presenters:
Ellen Tambor
Karen Moss
IMPACT Community Review Panel:
Katie Brandt
Lupita Gutierrez-Parker
Freddye James
Dale Rivard
Description: Pragmatic trials have been defined as an essential approach in the national strategy to rapidly and dramatically improve dementia care. It is therefore essential that trials are aligned with what matters most to people living with dementia, their care partners and families, and the health care systems that care for them. Interventions to improve dementia care often originate from researchers rather than emerging as a direct result of asking people living with dementia and care partners to define and prioritize the problems they need addressed. This disconnect between the interventions selected by researchers for testing and people’s everyday experiences of living with dementia is one reason why some interventions do not get adopted into care delivery, despite their apparent success during trials. In this grand rounds, we present the science of engaging community partners in research on dementia care and hear directly from members of IMPACT’s community review panel.
CoPsy PhD Dissertation Defense
Speaker: Victoria Halewicz
Title: How Communities Shape What We Believe
Advisor: Steven Sloman
Juneteenth Holiday. No University exercises.